Biomechanics Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Biomechanics, including details on mechanics of living organisms, movement, locomotion, prosthetic limbs. | ||||||||
|
The effects of anthropometrics, lifting strength, and physical activities in disc degeneration.Videman T, Levälahti E, Battié MC University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. tapio.videman@ualberta.ca STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study design was used. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to examine the influences of body anthropometrics, axial disc area, and lifting strength on disc degeneration and to compare these with the effects of lifetime physical demands and age. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although recent studies have shown that heredity is a dominant factor in disc degeneration, the common notion that occupational physical loading is the major risk factor persists. However, substantial variations in disc degeneration, particularly at the lowest lumbar levels, remain unexplained by heredity or occupational physical demands. METHODS: Univariate methods and stepwise multiple regression modeling were used to estimate associations of body height, weight, fat content, axial disc area, isokinetic lifting performance, and lifetime routine physical activities at work and leisure with disc height narrowing and disc signal (in T2 images) based on lumbar MRIs. These data were available from a population sample of 600 men, 35 to 70 years of age. RESULTS: Lower disc signal, representing disc desiccation, was associated with higher age, lower body mass and lifting strength, and larger axial disc area. Of the variance in disc signal, age explained 8.0% (P < 0.001) and body weight/axial disc area, isokinetic lifting strength, and occupational lifting history added 3.9%, 2.3%, and 1.3%, respectively. Greater disc narrowing was associated with higher age, larger axial disc area, and higher occupational physical loading. Of the variance in disc narrowing, age accounted for 3.8% (P < 0.001); axial disc area and occupational loading added 1.9% (P < 0.004) and 1.3% (P < 0.007), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Body weight, lifting strength, and axial disc area were more highly associated with disc degeneration than occupational and leisure physical activity histories, although all had modest influences. Furthermore, higher body mass, greater lifting strength, and heavier work were all associated with more disc height narrowing but less disc desiccation contrary to current views. Smaller discs appeared to have beneficial effects. Published 4 June 2007 in Spine, 32(13): 1406-13.
© 2005-2008 Biomechanics Research Today. All Rights Reserved. |
| ||||||
